Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh

Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in casinos and gambling.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking law and casinos and gambling.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Debt & Premium Player Status(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Surenthiraraj s/o Saunthararajah @ S.Suressh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	240,868.00	240,868.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Debt & Premium Player Status 29 Mar 2011 MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Neutral	29 Mar 2011	MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Leave to defend granted upon conditionLeave to defend granted upon the condition that the defendant pay into court, or provide security by way of a banker’s guarantee, the full amount of the claim (ie the sum of $240,868.00 with interest on the said sum at the annual rate of 12% from 14 August 2010 until 25 March 2011 (without prejudice to the plaintiff’s claimed sums as stated in its pleadings)), by 26 April 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.