Susan Tay

Susan Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Susan Tay has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disposition of Property	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Substituted Service	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ratification	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Susan Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Susan Tay has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes(Jun 2014) Fong Mun v Chan Yuen Lan: Resulting Trust & Beneficial Ownership of Matrimonial Home(May 2013)
OTP Law Corporation	2 cases	33% of cases	N K Rajarh v Tan Eng Chuan: Collective Sale, Incentive Payments & Good Faith(Nov 2013) Serafica Rogelio T v Transocean: Substituted Service & Examination of Judgment Debtor Orders(Jun 2013)
Ong Tay & Partners	2 cases	33% of cases	Cheo Sharon Andriesz v Official Assignee: Bankruptcy Act & Disposition of Property(Jan 2013) Cheo Sharon Andriesz v Official Assignee: Ratification of Property Disposition under Bankruptcy Act(Jul 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Susan Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Susan Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,500.00	300.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes 23 Jun 2014 See Fong Mun (Respondent)Partial	23 Jun 2014	See Fong Mun (Respondent): Partial VictoryMr See was declared to hold 84.17% of the beneficial interest in the Property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	N K Rajarh v Tan Eng Chuan: Collective Sale, Incentive Payments & Good Faith 07 Nov 2013 Madam Kee (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2013	Madam Kee (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; respondent awarded costs of the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Serafica Rogelio T v Transocean: Substituted Service & Examination of Judgment Debtor Orders 23 Jun 2013 Serafica Rogelio T (Appellant)Lost	23 Jun 2013	Serafica Rogelio T (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs to the respondent were fixed at $1,500 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Fong Mun v Chan Yuen Lan: Resulting Trust & Beneficial Ownership of Matrimonial Home 05 May 2013 See Fong Mun (Plaintiff)Won	05 May 2013	See Fong Mun (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared that the defendant was holding 24 Chancery Lane by way of a resulting trust for him. The court also declared the revocation of the Power of Attorney by the defendant as null and void.
5	Cheo Sharon Andriesz v Official Assignee: Bankruptcy Act & Disposition of Property 17 Jan 2013 Cheo Sharon Andriesz (Appellant)Lost	17 Jan 2013	Cheo Sharon Andriesz (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Cheo Sharon Andriesz v Official Assignee: Ratification of Property Disposition under Bankruptcy Act 02 Jul 2012 Cheo Sharon Andriesz (Applicant)Lost	02 Jul 2012	Cheo Sharon Andriesz (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ratification of the disposition of properties was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.