Sushil Nair

Sushil Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial management and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sushil Nair has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Renovation Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Restructuring	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sushil Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sushil Nair has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Point72 Ventures Investments LLC v FinLync Pte Ltd: Judicial Management Order(May 2023) Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception(Jun 2018) Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute(Oct 2002)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	17% of cases	Newspeed International v Citus Trading: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award Dispute(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sushil Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sushil Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	141,000.00	70,500.002 cases	2
USD	0.32	0.321 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Point72 Ventures Investments LLC v FinLync Pte Ltd: Judicial Management Order 04 May 2023 Phillip Ashley Klein (Non-party)Neutral	04 May 2023	Phillip Ashley Klein (Non-party): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome for non-party.
2	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception 20 Jun 2018 PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant)Won	20 Jun 2018	PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant): Injunctions set asidePT OKI succeeded in setting aside the injunctions obtained by Sunrise.
3	Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute 30 Oct 2002 Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2002	Asia Pulp & Paper Company Ltd (Respondent): Petition dismissedThe petition for a judicial management order was dismissed.
4	Panwell Pte Ltd v Indian Bank: Damages Assessment for Conversion of CBN Notes 18 Sep 2002 Panwell Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Sep 2002	Panwell Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Damages assessed at date of conversionDamages assessed at 32% of the face value of the CBN notes as at the date of conversion. Assumed USD, as the CBN notes are denominated in US dollars.
5	Great Eastern Hotel v Ng Yew Seng: Breach of Contract & Renovation Dispute 18 Nov 2001 Ang Kho Thang (Other)Won	18 Nov 2001	Ang Kho Thang (Other): Claims DismissedAll claims by any of the Defendants against Mr Ang personally are also dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Newspeed International v Citus Trading: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award Dispute 03 Jun 2001 Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	03 Jun 2001	Citus Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside order granting leave to enforce arbitration award dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).