Susila Ganesan

Susila Ganesan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and offer to settle. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Susila Ganesan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Intervention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Susila Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Susila Ganesan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Just Law LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement After Plaintiff's Death(Jul 2014) Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Offer to Settle & Impact of Plaintiff's Death on Damages(Sep 2013) Ong Derrick v Sim Chong Nam: Whiplash Injury Claim and Offer to Settle Dispute(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Susila Ganesan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Susila Ganesan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,000.00	4,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement After Plaintiff's Death 23 Jul 2014 Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jul 2014	Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court held that the victim's mother had no capacity to accept the offer.
2	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Offer to Settle & Impact of Plaintiff's Death on Damages 16 Sep 2013 Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2013	Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent.
3	Ong Derrick v Sim Chong Nam: Whiplash Injury Claim and Offer to Settle Dispute 09 Sep 2013 Sim Chong Nam (Defendant, Respondent)Won	09 Sep 2013	Sim Chong Nam (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; fixed costs of $1,000 post-Offer to Settle awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Tan Boon Heng v Lau Pang Cheng David: Principles Governing Review of Registrar's Decision on Damages Assessment 03 Sep 2013 Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	03 Sep 2013	Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $12,000 to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lau Pang Cheng David v Tan Boon Heng: Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment for Neck Injury and Loss of Earnings 30 Oct 2012 Lau Pang Cheng David (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	30 Oct 2012	Lau Pang Cheng David (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $6,000.00 plus reasonable disbursements. The court assumed the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.