Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar

Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate and estate administration. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in wills and probate and estate administration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Wills and Probate	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Offshore Trusts	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Wealth Protection	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
R. Ramason & Almenoar	1 cases	100% of cases	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute(May 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	110.0 parties avg	10.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Syed Hassan Bin Syed Esa Almenoar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute 31 May 2016 Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Plaintiff)Lost	31 May 2016	Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action against the first defendant is dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.