Sylvia Tee

Sylvia Tee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and civil practice. Their track record shows a 78.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sylvia Tee has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wasted Expenditure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reliance Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Advertising Expenses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forensic Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sylvia Tee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sylvia Tee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	100% of cases	Sanae Achar v SciGen Ltd: Wrongful Termination & Employment Contract Dispute(Nov 2011) Out of the Box v Wanin Industries: Assessment of Reliance Loss for Defective Drinks Supply(Oct 2011) Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim(Sep 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sylvia Tee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	78%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	72.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sylvia Tee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	7(78%)	78%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	655,280.70	131,056.145 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	7 16	Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 6 cases (85.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sanae Achar v SciGen Ltd: Wrongful Termination & Employment Contract Dispute 27 Nov 2011 SciGen Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2011	SciGen Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, SciGen Ltd, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
2	Out of the Box v Wanin Industries: Assessment of Reliance Loss for Defective Drinks Supply 10 Oct 2011 Out of the Box Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	10 Oct 2011	Out of the Box Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $655,280.70 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim 13 Sep 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant)Partial	13 Sep 2011	PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant): Partial compliance orderedFirst week of trial dates vacated; new directions issued with 'unless' orders.
4	Norwest Holdings v Newport Mining: Share Capital Sale Dispute After Sichuan Earthquake 22 Aug 2011 Newport Mining Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	22 Aug 2011	Newport Mining Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedNewport's appeal was allowed.
5	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Striking Out Application & Procedural Compliance 02 Jun 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant)Won	02 Jun 2011	PricewaterhouseCoopers (Defendant): Application to Strike Out UpheldThe defendant's position was supported as the court emphasized procedural compliance regarding the striking out application.
6	Neale v Ku De Ta: Trade Mark Infringement & Protection of Well-Known Marks 25 May 2011 Guy Neale and others (suing as a partnership) (Plaintiff)Won	25 May 2011	Guy Neale and others (suing as a partnership) (Plaintiff): Application dismissedDefendant's application to strike out portions of the plaintiff's statement of claim was dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Sanae Achar v Sci-Gen Ltd: Specific Discovery of Documents in Employment Contract Dispute 07 Apr 2011 Sci-Gen Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	07 Apr 2011	Sci-Gen Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Discovery application allowedDiscovery application allowed with slight modifications (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Anti-Suit Injunction & Abuse of Court Process 19 Dec 2010 Deutsche Bank AG (Respondent)Won	19 Dec 2010	Deutsche Bank AG (Respondent): Anti-suit injunction upheldThe anti-suit injunction granted by the High Court was upheld, preventing Beckkett Pte Ltd from continuing its Indonesian action.
9	Bidvest v Deacons: Escrow Agreement Dispute over US$4 Million Payout 26 Apr 2010 Vestey Foods Group Limited (Defendant)Neutral	26 Apr 2010	Vestey Foods Group Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantVestey was a second defendant. The court's decision favored Deacons, indirectly benefiting Vestey. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.