Tai Wei Shyong

Tai Wei Shyong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 28 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated expertise across 74 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	22 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	20 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	13 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	11 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Tenancies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
National Service Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Death Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligent Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Coroners Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inquiries	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyeurism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public decency and morals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tai Wei Shyong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tai Wei Shyong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	23 cases	82% of cases	PP v Randy Rosigit: Sentencing Framework for Possessing Child Abuse Material(Jul 2024) PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation(Jul 2023) PP v Tan Teck Leong Melvin: GST Evasion under Customs Act & Sentencing(Jul 2023)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	11% of cases	Tan Choon Kin v PP: Illegal Foreign Worker Employment & Immigration Act Violation(Sep 2002) PP v Koh Beng Oon: Criminal Breach of Trust, Pledges, and Parol Evidence(Nov 2000) Sivalingam Suresh v PP: Outraging Modesty with Criminal Force - Conviction Appeal(Jul 2000)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code(Mar 2003) Rizal bin Abdul Razak v Public Prosecutor: Rape and Abetment of Rape(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tai Wei Shyong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 4 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.0 parties avg	2.0	21%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	14%
Won	185.0 parties avg	5.0	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2022	77.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tai Wei Shyong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(21%)	21%
Partial	4(14%)	14%
Won	18(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	32,000.00	4,571.437 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2015	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	7 115	Lost: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 5 cases (71.4%)
2023	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 28 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Randy Rosigit: Sentencing Framework for Possessing Child Abuse Material 03 Jul 2024 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	03 Jul 2024	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased.
2	PP v Soo Cheow Wee: Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Criminal Intimidation 30 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	30 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
3	PP v Tan Teck Leong Melvin: GST Evasion under Customs Act & Sentencing 13 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	13 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part. The fine of $1m for each charge imposed by the DJ is to stand. However, the respondent is to serve 12 months’ imprisonment (instead of eight months) in default of payment for each charge or 36 months’ imprisonment in total. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Huang Xiaoyue v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Unlicensed Massage Services 11 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed.
5	Public Prosecutor v Rizuwan bin Rohmat: Road Traffic Act Offences and Sentencing 16 Mar 2023 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	16 Mar 2023	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to five weeks' imprisonment.
6	Nicholas Tan v Public Prosecutor: Voyeurism, s377BB(4) Penal Code & Sentencing 16 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially AllowedThe sentences imposed by the District Judge were set aside and substituted with a sentence of one week and three weeks’ imprisonment respectively, for an aggregate imprisonment of four weeks.
7	PP v GED & PP v GEH: Sentencing for Distribution of Intimate Images under Penal Code s 377BE(1) 30 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	30 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Prosecution's appeals in MA 9280 and MA 9008 were allowed in part.
8	Chelsea Tan v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Drug & Tobacco Offences 01 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	01 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the fines were substituted with imprisonment terms. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Statutory Interpretation and Public Order Act 27 Sep 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Sep 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, upholding the Public Prosecutor's position.
10	Woo Haw Ming v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Fraudulent Tenancies 24 Aug 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Aug 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
11	PP v Manta Equipment: Workplace Safety & Health Act - Employer's Duty & Sentencing 06 Jul 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Jul 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed.
12	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications 22 Jun 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	22 Jun 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent 11 May 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	11 May 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Successful in striking out OS 1025Costs of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid by Mr. Ravi and Mr. Cheng (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Allegations of Racial Discrimination in Drug Trafficking Prosecutions 01 Dec 2021 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	01 Dec 2021	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiffs' originating summons.
15	Public Prosecutor v Chairul: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Oct 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Oct 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
16	Winston Lee v PP: Outraging Modesty & Criminal Force in Medical Exam 19 Jul 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Jul 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
17	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
18	Attorney-General v Au Wai Pang: Scandalising Contempt and Freedom of Speech 20 Jan 2015 Attorney-General (Applicant)Partial	20 Jan 2015	Attorney-General (Applicant): PartialThe Attorney-General's application was partially successful; the Respondent was found guilty of scandalising contempt in respect of the First Article but not the Second Article.
19	Mohammed Ibrahim v PP: NS Default Sentencing - Fine Imposed 18 Dec 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	18 Dec 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was overturned.
20	Public Prosecutor v Hue An Li: Negligent Driving, Traffic Death, Sentencing Benchmarks 01 Sep 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	01 Sep 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was varied to four weeks' imprisonment.
21	Arun Kaliamurthy v PP: Riot, Sub Judice Rule & Fair Trial 22 Jun 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Jun 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Costs awardedThe Public Prosecutor was awarded costs to be paid by the accused persons. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Court of Appeal Jurisdiction 29 Apr 2014 Attorney-General (Applicant)Lost	29 Apr 2014	Attorney-General (Applicant): Application DismissedThe Attorney-General's application for leave to commence committal proceedings against Au Wai Pang was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Selvi v Attorney-General: Coroner's Inquiry & Death in Custody 31 Oct 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	31 Oct 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application for leave dismissedApplication for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code 04 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences of imprisonment and caning imposed on all five accused.
25	Tan Choon Kin v PP: Illegal Foreign Worker Employment & Immigration Act Violation 09 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
26	PP v Koh Beng Oon: Criminal Breach of Trust, Pledges, and Parol Evidence 30 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of Koh Beng Oon was dismissed.
27	Rizal bin Abdul Razak v Public Prosecutor: Rape and Abetment of Rape 23 Jul 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Jul 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction.
28	Sivalingam Suresh v PP: Outraging Modesty with Criminal Force - Conviction Appeal 11 Jul 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Jul 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction.