Tan Boon Gin

Tan Boon Gin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corruption	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bribery	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affray	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Law Enforcement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Boon Gin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Boon Gin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	6 cases	86% of cases	Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings(Aug 2001) Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court(Aug 2001) Silvalingam Sinnasamy v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving, Second Offender Sentencing, Road Traffic Act(Jun 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	14% of cases	Chua Tiong Tiong v PP: Corruption, Sentencing, and Public Interest(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Boon Gin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	72.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Boon Gin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	7 16	Neutral: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 6 cases (85.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings 27 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
2	Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court 27 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	27 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): No outcome information provided in the text.No outcome information provided in the text.
3	Chua Tiong Tiong v PP: Corruption, Sentencing, and Public Interest 15 Jul 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence EnhancedAppeal dismissed and sentence enhanced to 48 months imprisonment and a fine of $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Silvalingam Sinnasamy v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving, Second Offender Sentencing, Road Traffic Act 28 Jun 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Jun 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal.
5	Lim Poh Tee v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Corruption by Police Officer 06 Feb 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Feb 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the original sentence was upheld.
6	Public Prosecutor v Chew Suang Heng: Deterrent Sentence for Corruption Involving Law Enforcement 25 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	25 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and Chew Suang Heng was sentenced to two months' imprisonment in addition to the fine.
7	Eldon v Public Prosecutor: Affray Conviction Appeal - Penal Code s 160 14 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.