Tan Chee Meng SC

Tan Chee Meng SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Tax Cooperation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Incorporation by reference	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chee Meng SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Chee Meng SC has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	6 cases	75% of cases	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert v Public Prosecutor: False Information to Public Servant(Feb 2025) Ngee Ann Kongsi v Teochew Poit Ip Huay Kuan: Conversion of Originating Summons & Property Dispute(Oct 2019) Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception(May 2019)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(Jan 2022)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	13% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Noor Indra: Revision of Sentence under Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Chee Meng SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.4 parties avg	4.4	50%
Won	45.1 parties avg	5.1	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Chee Meng SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Won	4(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	242,000.00	40,333.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert v Public Prosecutor: False Information to Public Servant 09 Feb 2025 Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert (Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2025	Oh Hin Kwan Gilbert (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed, and the original sentence of one week's imprisonment was upheld.
2	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 27 Jan 2022 Nauman Hasan (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2022	Nauman Hasan (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against this defendant were dismissed.
3	Ngee Ann Kongsi v Teochew Poit Ip Huay Kuan: Conversion of Originating Summons & Property Dispute 29 Oct 2019 The Ngee Ann Kongsi (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Oct 2019	The Ngee Ann Kongsi (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe application to resist the conversion of the originating summons into a writ action was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception 29 May 2019 Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	29 May 2019	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which included the disbursements and the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal.
5	CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd v Ong Puay Koon: Contractual Term Interpretation & Indemnity 28 Nov 2017 Yap Tien Sung (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Nov 2017	Yap Tien Sung (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found that the indemnity clause did not make each party responsible for the breach of any term of the contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	AXY v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Tax Information Exchange 01 Mar 2017 AYB (Applicant)Lost	01 Mar 2017	AYB (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; costs awarded to the Respondent and the Attorney-General's Chambers (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chan Cheng Wah Bernard v Koh Sin Chong Freddie: Defamation Damages Assessment 24 Sep 2012 Others (Plaintiff)Won	24 Sep 2012	Others (Plaintiff): Damages AwardedAwarded $70,000 as general damages and $35,000 as aggravated damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Noor Indra: Revision of Sentence under Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Aug 2009 Muhammad Noor Indra bin Hamzah (Respondent)Won	17 Aug 2009	Muhammad Noor Indra bin Hamzah (Respondent): Sentence UpheldThe respondent's original sentence was upheld by the High Court.