Tan Chengxi

Tan Chengxi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and winding up. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Chengxi has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Scope of submission	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting aside enforcement order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Chengxi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Chengxi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Fastfreight Pte Ltd v Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd: Injunction, Winding Up & Arbitration(Aug 2022)
AsiaLegal LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	CDI v CDJ: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Arbitration Award for Vessel Sale(Jun 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Chengxi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Chengxi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	335,000.00	335,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fastfreight Pte Ltd v Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd: Injunction, Winding Up & Arbitration 30 Aug 2022 Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2022	Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd (Defendant): Injunction Granted AgainstInjunction granted against the defendant, restraining them from commencing winding-up proceedings until the conclusion of the London arbitration.
2	CDI v CDJ: Setting Aside Enforcement Order of Arbitration Award for Vessel Sale 18 Jun 2020 CDI (Plaintiff)Won	18 Jun 2020	CDI (Plaintiff): Application allowedApplication to enforce arbitration award allowed; the Plaintiff was awarded the sum of US$335,000, the payment of which was to be made by the Defendant to the Plaintiff either by procuring the release and return to the Plaintiff of the sum paid into the Defendant’s nominated account or by paying the sum to the Plaintiff directly. The Arbitrator also awarded interest on the sum at the rate of 2% per annum from the date of the Notice of Arbitration until payment.