Tan E-Fang

Tan E-Fang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in landlord and tenant law and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan E-Fang has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Distress for Rent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Classification of creditors	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Court's power to sanction proposed scheme of arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Execution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan E-Fang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan E-Fang has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	1 cases	33% of cases	Tiang Ming Sing v Datuk Ambrose Joseph Lee: Stock Trading, Moneylending, and Fiduciary Duty(May 2000)
Hin Tat Augustine and Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Re Horizon Knowledge Solutions: Scheme of Arrangement, Creditor Classification, Court Sanction(Dec 2004)
Hin Tat & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Heng Chyu Kee v Far East Square: Distress for Rent, Wrongful Execution of Writ, Landlord-Tenant Dispute(Nov 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan E-Fang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan E-Fang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Horizon Knowledge Solutions: Scheme of Arrangement, Creditor Classification, Court Sanction 01 Dec 2004 International Factors (Singapore) Ltd (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2004	International Factors (Singapore) Ltd (Respondent): Opposition successfulInternational Factors (Singapore) Ltd opposed the application, and the application was dismissed.
2	Heng Chyu Kee v Far East Square: Distress for Rent, Wrongful Execution of Writ, Landlord-Tenant Dispute 19 Nov 2001 Far East Square Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2001	Far East Square Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant, Far East Square Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tiang Ming Sing v Datuk Ambrose Joseph Lee: Stock Trading, Moneylending, and Fiduciary Duty 25 May 2000 Wong Teck Kui (Defendant)Won	25 May 2000	Wong Teck Kui (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs.