Tan Ee Hsien

Tan Ee Hsien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in companies act and civil practice. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in companies act and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Companies Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ee Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ee Hsien has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech Exchange: Minority Oppression Claim & Pleadings(Aug 2023) CZD v CZE: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award in Singapore(Apr 2023) Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech: Striking Out in Minority Oppression Claim(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ee Hsien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ee Hsien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech Exchange: Minority Oppression Claim & Pleadings 01 Aug 2023 Daniel Kroll (Plaintiff)Partial	01 Aug 2023	Daniel Kroll (Plaintiff): Application for further and better particulars allowed in partApplication for further and better particulars allowed in part. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CZD v CZE: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award in Singapore 04 Apr 2023 CZE (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2023	CZE (Defendant, Appellant): Application to set aside Enforcement Order dismissedDefendant's application to set aside Enforcement Order dismissed; each party to bear its own costs in SUM 4435. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech: Striking Out in Minority Oppression Claim 20 Sep 2022 Daniel Kroll (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Sep 2022	Daniel Kroll (Plaintiff): Application for striking out declinedApplication for striking out declined in part; paragraphs 55 and 56 of the Statement of Claim were struck out.