Tan Ee Kuan

Tan Ee Kuan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and sentencing. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rash Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ee Kuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ee Kuan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	PP v Muhammad Shafiq: Importation of Methamphetamine, Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2021) Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2020) Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ee Kuan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ee Kuan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	20,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Muhammad Shafiq: Importation of Methamphetamine, Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	21 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialCapital Charge not made out; convicted of amended charge of importing 0.97g of methamphetamine.
2	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements under the Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed.
3	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Attorney-General awarded costs of $40,000 from Steep Rise Limited (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	PP v Lim Choon Teck: Rash Cycling, Personal Safety, and Manifestly Excessive Sentence 13 Oct 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	13 Oct 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was reduced.