Tan Ei Leen

Tan Ei Leen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and inducement of breach of contract. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of confidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Franchise Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ei Leen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ei Leen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Coleman Street Chambers LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Golden Barley v BASP: Unjust Enrichment, Mistake of Fact, Failure of Consideration(Sep 2024) Shanghai Afute v. Tan Swee Meng: Franchise Agreement Dispute, Breach of Confidence, and Conspiracy(Feb 2023) Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd v Tan Yee Ling Ivy: Account Order & Payment for Misappropriated Dividends(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ei Leen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	18.0 parties avg	8.0	20%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	20%
Won	46.0 parties avg	6.0	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ei Leen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	751,990.46	187,997.624 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Golden Barley v BASP: Unjust Enrichment, Mistake of Fact, Failure of Consideration 15 Sep 2024 Golden Barley International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Sep 2024	Golden Barley International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shanghai Afute v. Tan Swee Meng: Franchise Agreement Dispute, Breach of Confidence, and Conspiracy 14 Feb 2023 Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Feb 2023	Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found in favor of the plaintiff on the claims of breach of contract, breach of confidence, and unlawful means conspiracy, granting inquiries into damages and an injunction against the defendant's use of the plaintiff's recipes.
3	Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd v Tan Yee Ling Ivy: Account Order & Payment for Misappropriated Dividends 25 Nov 2021 Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2021	Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Ivy was ordered to pay the sum of $631,285.62 to Exim forthwith (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Shanghai Afute v Tan Swee Meng: Contempt of Court for Using Confidential Recipes 21 Jun 2021 Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jun 2021	Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedOrder of committal granted against the defendants.
5	iVenture Card v Big Bus: Breach of Contract, Inducement, Conspiracy & Damages in Tourism Pass Dispute 25 May 2020 Low Lee Huat (Defendant)Won	25 May 2020	Low Lee Huat (Defendant): WoniVenture’s claim against James and Low personally for inducing breach of contract dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).