Tan En En

Tan En En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in administrative law and judicial review. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan En En has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Work Visa	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Prostitution	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Police Investigation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan En En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan En En has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Bao Haiyan v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of MOM's Decision to Cancel 'S Class' Work Pass(Sep 2009)
Attorney-General Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Anwar Siraj v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Orders Against Police and Senior District Judge Dismissed(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan En En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan En En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	2,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Anwar Siraj v Attorney-General: Application for Mandatory Orders Against Police and Senior District Judge Dismissed 07 Feb 2010 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	07 Feb 2010	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for leave to apply for mandatory orders was dismissed. Costs fixed to the Attorney-General at $4,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bao Haiyan v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of MOM's Decision to Cancel 'S Class' Work Pass 29 Sep 2009 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2009	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentApplication for leave to apply for a mandatory order was dismissed with costs.