Tan Gim Hai Adrian

Tan Gim Hai Adrian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 52% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated expertise across 87 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-Lease Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Mark Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Good Faith and Fidelity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mechanical and Electrical Design	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Design Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fitness for Purpose Warranty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effluxion of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Gim Hai Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Gim Hai Adrian has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	9 cases	43% of cases	Micro Tellers v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance & Conspiracy(Sep 2023) Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd: Striking Out, Fiduciary Relationships, Unlawful Means Conspiracies(Apr 2022) Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness(Jul 2021)
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	29% of cases	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Mistake, Breach, Frustration(Nov 2012) ANB v ANF: Defamation, O 14 r 12, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Justification Defence(Nov 2010) Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation(Sep 2010)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	4 cases	19% of cases	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power(May 2019) Ho Seow Wan v Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC: Contentious Business Agreements & Legal Profession Act(Feb 2018) Goh Seng Heng v RSP Investments: Injunctions & Shareholder Power Struggle(Dec 2016)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Extension of Time for Appeal and Waiver of Security Deposit(Nov 2007)
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	5% of cases	Soup Restaurant v Y.E.S. F&B: Sub-Lease Termination Dispute(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Gim Hai Adrian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.5
Complex Cases: 11 (52%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	1012.6 parties avg	12.6	48%
Partial	27.6 parties avg	7.6	10%
Won	94.1 parties avg	4.1	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2008	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	115.0 parties avg	15.0
2018	215.0 parties avg	15.0
2019	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2021	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Gim Hai Adrian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(48%)	48%
Partial	2(10%)	10%
Won	9(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	373,847.60	31,153.9712 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Micro Tellers v Cheng Yi Han: Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance & Conspiracy 05 Sep 2023 Wong Zhi Kang Clement (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Sep 2023	Wong Zhi Kang Clement (Plaintiff): Application granted in partLeave to amend the writ to join Lee Moon Young as a party together with leave to make the amendments to the statement of claim relating to her joinder is granted. Leave to add the three new causes of action is refused.
2	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd: Striking Out, Fiduciary Relationships, Unlawful Means Conspiracies 11 Apr 2022 Bosi Kasiman (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Apr 2022	Bosi Kasiman (Plaintiff): Claims for breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy struck outClaims for breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy were struck out as being obviously unsustainable.
3	Digi International Inc v Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd: Trade Mark Registration, Co-existence Agreement & Distinctiveness 01 Jul 2021 Digi International Inc. (Appellant)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Digi International Inc. (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Intellectual Property Adjudicator’s decision was dismissed.
4	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Teck Chuan (Respondent, Defendant)Won	04 May 2021	Ong Teck Chuan (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal in the amount of $65,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression, De Facto & Shadow Directors, Company Accounts 29 Jul 2020 Ong Teck Chuan (Defendant)Won	29 Jul 2020	Ong Teck Chuan (Defendant): Costs AwardedDefendant was awarded costs of SGD 230,000.00. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lim Chong Poon v Chiang Sing Jeong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Trust Deed 29 Mar 2020 Lim Chong Poon (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2020	Lim Chong Poon (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (all-in) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power 09 May 2019 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 May 2019	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims AllowedCounterclaims for a total of $71,347.60 under SCN003(a), SCN003(b), SCN005, SCN006 and SCN007 were allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	HT SRL v Wee Shuo Woon: Breach of Contract, Illegality, Public Policy, Restraint of Trade, Employee's Duty of Good Faith 17 Apr 2019 HT SRL (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Apr 2019	HT SRL (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partNominal damages awarded in the amount of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement 19 Feb 2019 Lian Chin Chiang (Defendant)Won	19 Feb 2019	Lian Chin Chiang (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed.
10	Lim Hun Joo v Kok Yin Chong: Collective Sale of Goodluck Garden - Land Titles (Strata) Act 25 Nov 2018 Michelle Ang Suan Choo (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2018	Michelle Ang Suan Choo (Defendant): Objection DismissedObjection to the collective sale dismissed; order granted for the collective sale of the property.
11	Ho Seow Wan v Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC: Contentious Business Agreements & Legal Profession Act 05 Feb 2018 Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC (formerly known as Stamford Law Corporation) (Defendant)Won	05 Feb 2018	Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC (formerly known as Stamford Law Corporation) (Defendant): Application grantedTaxation application dismissed; Mr. Ho ordered to pay costs of S$6,500 to MLS (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Goh Seng Heng v RSP Investments: Injunctions & Shareholder Power Struggle 11 Dec 2016 Quikglow Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dr Michelle Goh Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	11 Dec 2016	Quikglow Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dr Michelle Goh Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Injunction GrantedThe AM group's applications for a Mareva injunction and a Springboard injunction were granted.
13	Y.E.S. F&B v Soup Restaurant: Contract Interpretation & Sub-Lease Agreement Dispute 01 Oct 2015 Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant)Won	01 Oct 2015	Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. The usual consequential orders will follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Soup Restaurant v Y.E.S. F&B: Sub-Lease Termination Dispute 23 Nov 2014 Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	23 Nov 2014	Y.E.S. F&B GROUP PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's argument that the sub-lease was automatically renewed or renewable at their option was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Mistake, Breach, Frustration 11 Nov 2012 Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2012	Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff): Action dismissedThe plaintiff's action to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	ANB v ANF: Defamation, O 14 r 12, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Justification Defence 02 Nov 2010 ANB (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Nov 2010	ANB (Plaintiff): Unconditional leave to defend granted to defendantThe defendant raised a triable defence of justification and the plaintiff is therefore not entitled to summary judgment.
17	Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 29 Sep 2010 Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Sep 2010	Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff): Application to strike out defendants' application dismissedThe plaintiff's application to strike out the defendants' application to restrain Drew & Napier from acting for the plaintiff was dismissed.
18	Ng Kwok Weng v Ng Meiling: Gift Inter Vivos Dispute Over Joint Bank Account 28 Sep 2009 Ng Meiling (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2009	Ng Meiling (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; no order as to costs was made.
19	OCM Opportunities Fund v Pt Indah Kiat: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Discovery 14 May 2008 Pt Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Corporation (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	14 May 2008	Pt Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Corporation (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedPlaintiffs' appeal in Registrar's Appeal No 92 of 2008 dismissed.
20	Hytech Builders v Goh: Defamation, Fair Comment & Qualified Privilege 07 Apr 2008 Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant)Won	07 Apr 2008	Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant): Defense upheldThe defendant successfully invoked the defense of qualified privilege, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Extension of Time for Appeal and Waiver of Security Deposit 05 Nov 2007 Lee Hsien Loong (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2007	Lee Hsien Loong (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications DismissedThe applications for extension of time to file appeals and waiver of security deposit were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.