Tan Heng Khim

Tan Heng Khim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and attempt to murder. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences relating to race	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Backdating of Sentence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Discretion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Newton Hearing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempt to Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alteration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
SIA Conditions of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Heng Khim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Heng Khim has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Apex Law LLP	3 cases	60% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder Sentencing - Singapore High Court(Jun 2018) Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & Provocation(Feb 2018) Hapsuwan Sakon v CT Civil Construction: Negligence Claim for Cyclist-Truck Collision(Mar 2017)
Sankar Ow & Partners LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Lim Koon Hai v Alex Yeo: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase Dispute(Apr 2013)
Sankar Ow & Partners	1 cases	20% of cases	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Repainting Contract Dispute over Paint Specifications and Payment(Sep 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Heng Khim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	60%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Heng Khim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	911,274.90	455,637.452 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder Sentencing - Singapore High Court 03 Jun 2018 BPK (Defendant)Lost	03 Jun 2018	BPK (Defendant): Conviction and SentenceThe Accused was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane.
2	Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & Provocation 13 Feb 2018 BPK (Defendant)Lost	13 Feb 2018	BPK (Defendant): Conviction on the charge of attempted murderThe Accused was convicted on the charge of attempted murder.
3	Hapsuwan Sakon v CT Civil Construction: Negligence Claim for Cyclist-Truck Collision 28 Mar 2017 Hapsuwan Sakon (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Mar 2017	Hapsuwan Sakon (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment grantedInterlocutory judgment granted to the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Liability apportioned 80% to the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lim Koon Hai v Alex Yeo: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase Dispute 25 Apr 2013 Another (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Apr 2013	Another (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim for specific performance or damages in lieu of specific performance was dismissed.
5	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Repainting Contract Dispute over Paint Specifications and Payment 25 Sep 2011 SKK (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Sep 2011	SKK (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for payments certified but not paid ($307,479.02), spalling concrete works not certified ($342,399.60), and refund of performance guarantee ($261,396). Interlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for prolongation costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.