Tan Hin Wa, Jason

Tan Hin Wa, Jason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in security of payment and striking out.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Charterparty Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procurement Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hin Wa, Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Hin Wa, Jason has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Asia Ascent Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Likpin v Swiber: Breach of Contract & Admiralty Claim over Vessel Charter(Sep 2015) Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: Challenging Adjudication Jurisdiction Under SOPA(Aug 2015) Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: SOPA & Validity of Payment Claims After Final Claim(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Hin Wa, Jason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Hin Wa, Jason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Lost	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Likpin v Swiber: Breach of Contract & Admiralty Claim over Vessel Charter 30 Sep 2015 LIKPIN INTERNATIONAL LTD (Plaintiff)Dismissed	30 Sep 2015	LIKPIN INTERNATIONAL LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract and tortious interference was dismissed.
2	Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: Challenging Adjudication Jurisdiction Under SOPA 19 Aug 2015 Lau Fook Hoong Adam (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Aug 2015	Lau Fook Hoong Adam (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application challenging the adjudicator's jurisdiction was dismissed.
3	Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: SOPA & Validity of Payment Claims After Final Claim 24 May 2015 Lau Fook Hoong Adam (Plaintiff)Lost	24 May 2015	Lau Fook Hoong Adam (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed in its entirety.