Tan Hoe Shuen

Tan Hoe Shuen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Executors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alternative Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Multi-tiered dispute resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hoe Shuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Hoe Shuen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Silvester Legal LLC	7 cases	88% of cases	Deniyal bin Kamis v Mapo Engineering: Minority Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act(Jul 2023) Hoie Kok Hing v Hoie Tip Fong: Trust, Probate, and Administration Dispute over Property Shares(Jun 2023) EXXA Network Pte Ltd v SQ2 Fintech Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings for Mediation and Arbitration(Nov 2021)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd: Breach of Confidence, Contract, and Inducement of Breach of Contract(Nov 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Hoe Shuen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	38%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	53.2 parties avg	3.2
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Hoe Shuen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Stayed	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	753,211.35	188,302.844 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd: Breach of Confidence, Contract, and Inducement of Breach of Contract 13 Nov 2024 Kim Jin Wu (Defendant)Won	13 Nov 2024	Kim Jin Wu (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Kim Jin Wu were dismissed.
2	Deniyal bin Kamis v Mapo Engineering: Minority Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act 03 Jul 2023 Deniyal bin Kamis (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jul 2023	Deniyal bin Kamis (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; share buy-out ordered. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Hoie Kok Hing v Hoie Tip Fong: Trust, Probate, and Administration Dispute over Property Shares 21 Jun 2023 Hoie Kok Hing (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2023	Hoie Kok Hing (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed in totality.
4	EXXA Network Pte Ltd v SQ2 Fintech Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings for Mediation and Arbitration 25 Nov 2021 EXXA Network Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Stayed	25 Nov 2021	EXXA Network Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Proceedings StayedAll proceedings in this action shall be stayed pursuant to s 8 of the Mediation Act and s 6 of the Arbitration Act.
5	Exim & Mfr Holdings Pte Ltd v Tan Yee Ling Ivy: Account Order & Payment for Misappropriated Dividends 25 Nov 2021 Tan Yee Ling Ivy (Chen Yiling) (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2021	Tan Yee Ling Ivy (Chen Yiling) (Defendant): Payment OrderedIvy was ordered to pay the sum of $631,285.62 to Exim forthwith (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	VJP v VJQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Exclusion on Appeal 11 Aug 2021 VJP (Appellant)Won	11 Aug 2021	VJP (Appellant): Appeal AllowedWife is entitled to 44.8% of the reduced matrimonial pool, resulting in an additional $52,665.73.
7	CLI v CLJ: Appeal for Shared Care and Control of Child Rejected 09 Jun 2021 CLI (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	09 Jun 2021	CLI (Applicant, Appellant): Application for leave to appeal dismissedHusband's application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs of $2,600 inclusive of disbursements to the wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Gui Chien Cheong Martin v Facilit8te Pte Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Conduct 29 Apr 2021 Mok Check Paul (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2021	Mok Check Paul (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment was given in favor of the defendant, Mok Check Paul.