Tan Hui Hsing

Tan Hui Hsing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and extension of time. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hui Hsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Hui Hsing has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	2 cases	100% of cases	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001) The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Hui Hsing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Hui Hsing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 Ah Lam II (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2001	Ah Lam II (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 'Pu 1804' (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2001	'Pu 1804' (Respondent): Extension of Time GrantedThe respondents were granted an extension of time to file the reference to the registrar for assessment of damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).