Tan Hui Tsing

Tan Hui Tsing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	17 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	16 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	12 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collision	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside default judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time for detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale Pendente Lite	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discontinuance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tonnage limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bareboat Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cargo Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cargo Operations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bunker Supply	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Redelivery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Delivery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vessel Lease Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demise Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sheriff's Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Average	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
York Antwerp Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Irregularity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charterparty Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wreck Removal Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nominee Director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Hui Tsing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Hui Tsing has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurbani & Co.	7 cases	32% of cases	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement(Nov 2018) Winplus Corp v Frumentarius: Admiralty Jurisdiction & Bareboat Charter Termination(Feb 2015) The Nasco Gem: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Arrest Warrant(Jan 2014)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	6 cases	27% of cases	The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim(Oct 2003) Ever Lucky Shipping v Sunlight Mercantile: General Average Contribution & Seaworthiness Under Hague Rules(Apr 2003) Pirelli v PSA: Hague-Visby Rules & Weight Limitation for Damaged Goods(Feb 2003)
DennisMathiew	4 cases	18% of cases	Aastar Trading v Olam Global Agri: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Pending Setting Aside(Jan 2025) Bumi Jaya v Brave Worth: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Wreck Removal Contract Dispute(Dec 2023) Marchand Navigation v Olam Global Agri & Sinco Shipping: Lien over Sub-Freights & Arbitration Stay(Nov 2023)
Gurbani & Co LLC	4 cases	18% of cases	POS Maritime NX S.A. v Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11: Collision, Time-Bar & Single Liability Principle(Feb 2021) Thoresen Shipping v Global Symphony: Limitation of Liabilities & Tonnage in Admiralty Collision(Jul 2020) Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd v Heroic Warrior Inc: Damage to Palm Oil Cargo Due to Negligence(Jun 2019)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	5% of cases	Teng He: Apportionment of Responsibility in Negligence Case Involving Damage to Submerged Seismic Cables(Sep 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Hui Tsing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 8 (36%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	5%
Lost	62.3 parties avg	2.3	27%
Neutral	210.5 parties avg	10.5	9%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	14%
Unknown	24.0 parties avg	4.0	9%
Won	85.2 parties avg	5.2	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2012	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2014	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Hui Tsing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	6(27%)	27%
Neutral	2(9%)	9%
Partial	3(14%)	14%
Unknown	2(9%)	9%
Won	8(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	8,361,285.01	8,361,285.011 cases	1
SGD	14,000.00	2,800.005 cases	5
USD	671,818.98	223,939.663 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Unknown: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Aastar Trading v Olam Global Agri: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Pending Setting Aside 12 Jan 2025 Aastar Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant)Neutral	12 Jan 2025	Aastar Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant): Adjournment of enforcement proceedings grantedAdjournment of Singapore enforcement proceedings granted pending the final determination of the Malaysian setting aside application.
2	Bumi Jaya v Brave Worth: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Wreck Removal Contract Dispute 19 Dec 2023 Bumi Jaya Salvage & Engineering Sdn Bhd (Claimant)Partial	19 Dec 2023	Bumi Jaya Salvage & Engineering Sdn Bhd (Claimant): Partial JudgmentJudgment entered against the defendant in favour of the claimant for the sum of US$275,000 in respect of invoice no. BJSESB/PG/094/23.
3	Marchand Navigation v Olam Global Agri & Sinco Shipping: Lien over Sub-Freights & Arbitration Stay 28 Nov 2023 Marchand Navigation Company (Claimant)Won	28 Nov 2023	Marchand Navigation Company (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantMarchand was entitled to exercise its lien pursuant to Clause 18 of the Charterparty dated 29 April 2022 in respect of the US$190,112 owed by Olam to Sinco.
4	Hyphen Trading v BLPL Singapore: Sale of Cargo Pendente Lite Dispute 24 Oct 2023 Hyphen Trading Limited (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	24 Oct 2023	Hyphen Trading Limited (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): Application DismissedClaimant's application for sale of cargo pendente lite was dismissed, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of S$14,000 to the third defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	POS Maritime NX S.A. v Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11: Collision, Time-Bar & Single Liability Principle 21 Feb 2021 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 (IMO No. 9018359) (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2021	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11 (IMO No. 9018359) (Defendant): Question answered in the negativeThe court determined that the Defendant is not able to rely on or raise the ‘single liability principle’ in diminution and/or reduction of the Plaintiff’s claim in this action in circumstances where the Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiff is time-barred.
6	Thoresen Shipping v Global Symphony: Limitation of Liabilities & Tonnage in Admiralty Collision 21 Jul 2020 Thoresen & Company (Bangkok) Limited (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jul 2020	Thoresen & Company (Bangkok) Limited (Plaintiff): Order granted for return of LOU for cancellationOrder granted for return of Letter of Undertaking for cancellation.
7	Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd v Heroic Warrior Inc: Damage to Palm Oil Cargo Due to Negligence 03 Jun 2019 Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jun 2019	Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $206,706.98 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves international trade and the damages are calculated in USD).
8	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 Gasmar AS (Other)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	Gasmar AS (Other): NeutralNo objections to the moratorium
9	Elbow Holdings Pte Ltd v Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd: Injunctions & Breach of Contract Dispute 08 May 2016 Elbow Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 May 2016	Elbow Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for relief against forfeiture was dismissed.
10	Winplus Corp v Frumentarius: Admiralty Jurisdiction & Bareboat Charter Termination 17 Feb 2015 KRC Efko-Kaskad LLC (Plaintiff)Won	17 Feb 2015	KRC Efko-Kaskad LLC (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to set aside the in rem writ.
11	The Nasco Gem: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Arrest Warrant 06 Jan 2014 Respondent (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	06 Jan 2014	Respondent (Respondent, Plaintiff): Application allowedThe application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was dismissed with costs, in favour of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	The "Chem Orchid": Admiralty Jurisdiction, Demise Charter, and Ostensible Authority Dispute 05 Jan 2014 Frumentarius Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	05 Jan 2014	Frumentarius Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed as the court set aside the ADM proceedings.
13	The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Megastar Shipping v ANL Singapore, Sheriff's Expenses in Admiralty Action 28 Aug 2012 Kim Tiong Enterprises Pte Ltd (Intervener, Respondent)	28 Aug 2012	Kim Tiong Enterprises Pte Ltd (Intervener, Respondent): -
14	ANL Singapore Pte Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Unpaid Slot Charter-Hire Dispute 28 Aug 2012 Kim Tiong Enteprises Pte Ltd (Intervener)	28 Aug 2012	Kim Tiong Enteprises Pte Ltd (Intervener): -
15	Equatorial Marine v "Bunga Melati 5": Agency by Estoppel & Bunker Supply Dispute 20 Aug 2012 MISC Berhad (Respondent)Lost	20 Aug 2012	MISC Berhad (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the respondent was allowed.
16	The Melati: Discontinuance of Action Due to Late Service of Statement of Claim 20 Oct 2003 Plaintiffs (Appellant)Won	20 Oct 2003	Plaintiffs (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; time for service of the Statement of Claim extended. The Statement of Claim is to stand as served on 18 March 2003.
17	Ever Lucky Shipping v Sunlight Mercantile: General Average Contribution & Seaworthiness Under Hague Rules 14 Apr 2003 Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Apr 2003	Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentEntitled to recover general average contribution only from deck cargo. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Pirelli v PSA: Hague-Visby Rules & Weight Limitation for Damaged Goods 20 Feb 2003 United Thai Shipping Corp Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Feb 2003	United Thai Shipping Corp Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court determined that the limitation quantum applicable to the three damaged drums is based on the actual weight damaged, yielding a limitation quantum of $151,814.97.
19	Kwee Seng Chio Peter v Biogenics Sdn Bhd: Loan Agreement Dispute & Director's Authority 10 Dec 2002 Biogenics Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	10 Dec 2002	Biogenics Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant for the principal sum of RM7 million with costs together with interest of RM1,361,285.01 as at 18th October 2002 and thereafter interest to continue at the contractual rate of 8.5% per annum until date of payment. Assumed MYR as the judgment concerns a Malaysian company and the loan was in RM.
20	ASL Power: Title to Goods, Bills of Lading & C&F Contracts Dispute 28 Jul 2002 C M Van Sillevoldt Specerijen BV (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jul 2002	C M Van Sillevoldt Specerijen BV (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim is dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Teng He: Apportionment of Responsibility in Negligence Case Involving Damage to Submerged Seismic Cables 24 Sep 2000 Owners of the cables (Respondent)Lost	24 Sep 2000	Owners of the cables (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were held liable for 60% of the damage, while the appellants were liable for 40%.
22	Teng He v Nordic Explorer: Collision at Sea, Negligence, and Contributory Negligence in Bo Hai Gulf 30 Mar 2000 Nordic Explorer (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Mar 2000	Nordic Explorer (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff, with the defendants found 60% liable. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.