Tan Huiru Sally

Tan Huiru Sally is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and costs. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and winding up.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Huiru Sally has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Huiru Sally has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Suying Design Pte Ltd v Ng Kian Huan: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Interior Design Business(May 2020) Ng Kian Huan Edmund v Suying Metropolitan Studio: Minority Oppression & Oral Agreement Dispute(Sep 2019) Naseer Ahmad Akhtar v Suresh Agarwal: Quorum, Director Removal & Companies Act(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Huiru Sally's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Huiru Sally's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	405,500.00	135,166.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Suying Design Pte Ltd v Ng Kian Huan: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Interior Design Business 12 May 2020 Tan Teow Feng Patty (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	12 May 2020	Tan Teow Feng Patty (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the Judge's orders in respect of Mr. Ng's oppression claim.
2	Ng Kian Huan Edmund v Suying Metropolitan Studio: Minority Oppression & Oral Agreement Dispute 29 Sep 2019 Tan Teow Feng Patty (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	29 Sep 2019	Tan Teow Feng Patty (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): LostOrdered to pay Edmund $400,000 for the oppression action and her counterclaim, and to bear the costs payable by SMSPL to MOX and Jazz (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Naseer Ahmad Akhtar v Suresh Agarwal: Quorum, Director Removal & Companies Act 01 Oct 2015 Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Applicant)Won	01 Oct 2015	Naseer Ahmad Akhtar (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication granted; EGM to be convened with one member sufficient for quorum. Costs awarded to the plaintiff, fixed at $9,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Harwindar Singh v Michael Wong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Oral Agreement 17 May 2015 Michael Wong Lok Yung (Defendant, Appellant)Won	17 May 2015	Michael Wong Lok Yung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and the Plaintiff's claim was struck out. The Plaintiff was ordered to pay the First Defendant's costs fixed at $5,500 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.