Tan Jia Hui

Tan Jia Hui is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and mortgage law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Creditors Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Debenture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Fuel Oil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sales Confirmations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Notice of Assignment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rights of Set-Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract of Affreightment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transportation Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offset Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Authenticity of Documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Claim	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Jia Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jia Hui has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LVM Law Chambers LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	CIMB Bank Bhd v Italmatic Tyre: Assignment, Set-Off & Recovery of US$2.43M Debt(Jul 2020) CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020) Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh: Undue Influence, Estate Assets, and Interim Injunction(Jun 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jia Hui's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jia Hui's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	2,699,793.30	2,699,793.301 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CIMB Bank Bhd v Italmatic Tyre: Assignment, Set-Off & Recovery of US$2.43M Debt 29 Jul 2020 CIMB Bank Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jul 2020	CIMB Bank Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the outstanding principal sum of US$2,431,220.87, contractual interest on the sum due under each invoice from the due date of each invoice until 19 February 2018 at the rate of 2% per month pursuant to Clause 8.3 of Panoil’s Terms and Conditions, such interest amounting to US$268,572.43, contractual interest on the said sum of US$2,431,220.87 at the rate of 2% per month from 20 February 2018 until payment is received, pursuant to Clause 8.3 of Panoil’s Terms and Conditions, and the costs of and incidental to this action, such costs to be taxed on the indemnity basis if not agreed.
2	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off 08 Jun 2020 CIMB Bank Berhad (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jun 2020	CIMB Bank Berhad (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCIMB's claims were dismissed due to failure to prove the authenticity of the Debenture.
3	Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh: Undue Influence, Estate Assets, and Interim Injunction 17 Jun 2018 Sia Tze Ming (Non-party)Won	17 Jun 2018	Sia Tze Ming (Non-party): Intervention AllowedMs. Sia was permitted to intervene in the action for the restricted purposes of dealing with the interim injunction application, any application to vary or discharge the interim injunction, as well as any appeal arising from the interim injunction application or the application to intervene.