Tan Jia Wei Justin

Tan Jia Wei Justin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Parity Principle	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Wei Justin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jia Wei Justin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	JP Nelson v Builders Hub: Setting Aside SOPA Adjudication for Fraud and Premature Application(Jul 2023) Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA, Termination Clauses & Payment Claims(May 2023)
Trident Law Corporation	2 cases	50% of cases	Audi Construction v Kian Hiap Construction: SOPA, Premature Payment Claims & Waiver(Jul 2017) Chong Han Rui v Public Prosecutor: Parity Principle in Sentencing of Co-Offenders(Feb 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jia Wei Justin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jia Wei Justin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Other	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	155,160.00	155,160.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Other: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JP Nelson v Builders Hub: Setting Aside SOPA Adjudication for Fraud and Premature Application 04 Jul 2023 JP Nelson Equipment Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	04 Jul 2023	JP Nelson Equipment Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partThe Adjudication Review Amount was reduced by $155,160, and Builders Hub is ordered to repay JP Nelson the sum of $155,160, being the sum that Builders Hub had unlawfully gained by the fraud. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Builders Hub v JP Nelson: SOPA, Termination Clauses & Payment Claims 02 May 2023 JP Nelson Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Other	02 May 2023	JP Nelson Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Adjudication Determination set aside and remittedThe Adjudication Determination was set aside and remitted to the learned Adjudicator for further determination.
3	Audi Construction v Kian Hiap Construction: SOPA, Premature Payment Claims & Waiver 10 Jul 2017 Audi Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	10 Jul 2017	Audi Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): LostApplication to enforce adjudication determination dismissed.
4	Chong Han Rui v Public Prosecutor: Parity Principle in Sentencing of Co-Offenders 25 Feb 2016 Chong Han Rui (Appellant)Won	25 Feb 2016	Chong Han Rui (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the Appellant was sentenced to probation for 27 months (12 months intensive and 15 months supervised).