Tan Jia Xin

Tan Jia Xin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated expertise across 46 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and restructuring and dissolution.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jia Xin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jia Xin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal(Jan 2025) Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification(Oct 2024) DIB v DIC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice in Confectionary Product Line Contract Dispute(Jul 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jia Xin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	29.3 parties avg	9.3	40%
Won	34.3 parties avg	4.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2024	36.7 parties avg	6.7
2025	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jia Xin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	16,000.00	8,000.002 cases	2
USD	124,474,854.00	124,474,854.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal 15 Jan 2025 UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	15 Jan 2025	UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Appellant): Application DismissedAdmission application dismissed with costs of $8,000 all-in. Costs to be borne by UTSS. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification 14 Oct 2024 UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Non-party, Respondent, Applicant)Lost	14 Oct 2024	UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Non-party, Respondent, Applicant): Application DismissedUTSS's application to set aside the Convening Order was dismissed. UTSS opposed the sanction application, which was granted.
3	DIB v DIC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice in Confectionary Product Line Contract Dispute 25 Jul 2024 DIC (Respondent)Won	25 Jul 2024	DIC (Respondent): Award UpheldThe Respondent successfully defended the application to set aside the arbitral award.
4	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts 25 Jul 2024 JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Jul 2024	JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Claimant): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted. JTA's costs of and incidental to this winding up application be paid to JTA out of GLH’s assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Group Lease Holdings v JTrust Asia: Issue Estoppel & Damages in Deceit & Conspiracy 21 Nov 2023 JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	21 Nov 2023	JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $124,474,854.00 plus interest (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to US dollar amounts).