Tan Jin Sheng

Tan Jin Sheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jin Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jin Sheng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts(Jan 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jin Sheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jin Sheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Li Weiming (Respondent)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Li Weiming (Respondent): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.