Tan Jun Hong

Tan Jun Hong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Transnational issue estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jun Hong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jun Hong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
D’Bi An LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Eng Teng Cheng v Government of the City of Buenos Aires: Corporate Veil Lifting and Choice of Law(May 2024)
Calvin Liang LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Sacofa Sdn Bhd v Super Sea Cable Networks: Arbitration Award Setting Aside & Jurisdiction(Feb 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jun Hong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jun Hong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	186,000.00	93,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Eng Teng Cheng v Government of the City of Buenos Aires: Corporate Veil Lifting and Choice of Law 14 May 2024 Nicholas Eng Teng Cheng (Appellant)Won	14 May 2024	Nicholas Eng Teng Cheng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of $120,000 awarded to the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Sacofa Sdn Bhd v Super Sea Cable Networks: Arbitration Award Setting Aside & Jurisdiction 27 Feb 2024 SEAX Malaysia Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2024	SEAX Malaysia Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent successfully defended against the application to set aside the arbitral award and was awarded costs of SGD 33,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.