Tan Jun Yin

Tan Jun Yin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Jun Yin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Jun Yin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Trident Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor(Nov 2024) Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession(Apr 2023) PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Jun Yin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Jun Yin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor 05 Nov 2024 GIL (Appellant)Lost	05 Nov 2024	GIL (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
2	Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession 25 Apr 2023 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2023	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel 28 Mar 2022 Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant)Lost	28 Mar 2022	Mohd Noor bin Ismail (Accused, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe court found that the conduct of the trial counsel was not so wanting as to give rise to a real possibility of a miscarriage of justice, and that no inducement, threat, or promise was made by the investigation officer.