Tan Kai Ning Claire

Tan Kai Ning Claire is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 73.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated expertise across 70 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apparent Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Challenge against arbitrator	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duties of Legal Profession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Kai Ning Claire has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kai Ning Claire has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	7 cases	64% of cases	Lilyana Alwi v. John Arifin: Express Trusts, Resulting Trusts, Breach of Trust, and Fraud(May 2019) Lim Sze Eng v Lin Choo Mee: Contractual Interpretation, Settlement Agreement, and Reasonable Endeavours(Nov 2018) Lin Choo Mee v Lim Sze Eng: Dispute over Settlement Agreement for Tat Leong Companies' Shares(Jan 2018)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	4 cases	36% of cases	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement(Dec 2023) CVV v CWB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Nov 2023) Quayside Investments Pte Ltd v 38 Degrees Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms & Construction Rules(Jul 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kai Ning Claire's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.2
Complex Cases: 4 (36%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	310.5 parties avg	10.5	27%
Won	85.8 parties avg	5.8	73%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	211.3 parties avg	11.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kai Ning Claire's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(27%)	27%
Won	8(73%)	73%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	79,000.00	13,166.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement 06 Dec 2023 CNPLaw LLP (formerly known as Colin Ng & Partnership) (Defendant)Won	06 Dec 2023	CNPLaw LLP (formerly known as Colin Ng & Partnership) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe Lenders’ claim against CNP was dismissed.
2	CVV v CWB: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 30 Nov 2023 CWA (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2023	CWA (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at S$100,000, plus disbursements of S$7,650 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Quayside Investments Pte Ltd v 38 Degrees Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms & Construction Rules 22 Jul 2021 38 Degrees Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Jul 2021	38 Degrees Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court declared that the deed of rights is not a security document as defined in the loan agreement, dismissing 38 Degrees' argument (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ong Keh Choo v Paul Huntington Bernardo: Contract Law, Consideration & Misrepresentation 15 Jul 2020 Tran Hong Hanh (Respondent, Defendant)Won	15 Jul 2020	Tran Hong Hanh (Respondent, Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the respondent was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
5	Lilyana Alwi v. John Arifin: Express Trusts, Resulting Trusts, Breach of Trust, and Fraud 01 May 2019 John Arifin (Defendant)Lost	01 May 2019	John Arifin (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedThe defendant’s counterclaim in respect of half of the moneys in the Joint Accounts was dismissed.
6	Lim Sze Eng v Lin Choo Mee: Contractual Interpretation, Settlement Agreement, and Reasonable Endeavours 29 Nov 2018 Lin Choo Mee (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2018	Lin Choo Mee (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentAwarded costs of the appeal fixed at S$24,000 (inclusive of disbursements) as well as two-thirds of the costs in the proceedings below (to be taxed if not agreed). Assumed SGD as the judgment does not specify a currency and the jurisdiction is Singapore.
7	Lin Choo Mee v Lim Sze Eng: Dispute over Settlement Agreement for Tat Leong Companies' Shares 07 Jan 2018 Lin Choo Mee (Plaintiff)Won	07 Jan 2018	Lin Choo Mee (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed for the defendant’s breach of clauses 10(b) and 10(c) of the Settlement Agreement. Interlocutory judgment for breach of clause 13 of the Settlement Agreement. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Prometheus Marine v. King: Challenge to Arbitrator & Setting Aside Award for Yacht Defects 23 Oct 2017 Ann Rita King (Respondent)Won	23 Oct 2017	Ann Rita King (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $55,000 plus disbursements of $1141.40 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Goh Seng Heng v RSP Investments: Injunctions & Shareholder Power Struggle 11 Dec 2016 PPP Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Dec 2016	PPP Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedThe AM group's applications for a Mareva injunction and a Springboard injunction were granted.
10	Venkatraman Kalyanaraman v Nithya Kalyani: Striking Out, Res Judicata, Derivative Action, Minority Shareholders 09 Aug 2016 Marimuthu Palaniswami (Defendant, Respondent)Won	09 Aug 2016	Marimuthu Palaniswami (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision to strike out the statement of claim and reply.
11	Lin Choo Mee v Tat Leong: Winding Up Family Companies on Just & Equitable Grounds 12 Apr 2015 Lin Choo Mee (Applicant)Won	12 Apr 2015	Lin Choo Mee (Applicant): Application GrantedApplications to wind up the Tat Leong companies were granted.