Tan Kai Yun

Tan Kai Yun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Capital	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share buybacks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kai Yun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kai Yun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification(Oct 2024) Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading(Aug 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kai Yun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	29%
Neutral	114.0 parties avg	14.0	14%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	28.5 parties avg	8.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kai Yun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification 14 Oct 2024 ABN Amro Bank N.V. (Non-party)Neutral	14 Oct 2024	ABN Amro Bank N.V. (Non-party): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
2	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Aug 2024	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading 17 Aug 2023 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant)Won	17 Aug 2023	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited as the Fraud Exception was established.
4	OCBC v Lim Sor Choo: Mortgage, Guarantee, and Contractual Interpretation 03 Jun 2020 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jun 2020	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed with costs.
5	Hyflux Ltd v SM Investments Pte Ltd: Striking Out Counterclaim & Summary Determination of Restructuring Agreement 02 Oct 2019 Hyflux Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2019	Hyflux Ltd (Plaintiff): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim can be raised as a defence without leave of Court. Leave is granted to pursue remedies beyond a pure defence, but no execution of any judgment is to occur without leave while the moratorium is in place.
6	Enterprise Fund III Ltd v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Company Acquiring Own Shares & Estoppel 12 Sep 2019 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant)Lost	12 Sep 2019	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
7	IHC v Enterprise Fund: Share Buybacks & Companies Act s76/76A 12 Nov 2018 Value Monetization III Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 Nov 2018	Value Monetization III Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court ruled against the defendant, Value Monetization III Ltd.