Tan Kay Khai

Tan Kay Khai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in illegality and public policy and betting law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheques	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Betting Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gaming contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gaming Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kay Khai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kay Khai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Michael Khoo & Partners	4 cases	100% of cases	Marina Tanker Sdn Bhd v Chan Fook Choon: Negligent Engine Repair Dispute(Jun 2002) Marina Tanker v Chan Fook Choon: Negligence Claim for Ship Engine Repair(Apr 2002) Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kay Khai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kay Khai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marina Tanker Sdn Bhd v Chan Fook Choon: Negligent Engine Repair Dispute 11 Jun 2002 Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant)Lost	11 Jun 2002	Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant): Claim Dismissed in PartThe court found the defendant liable for negligent repair of the engine, but disallowed certain claimed expenses.
2	Marina Tanker v Chan Fook Choon: Negligence Claim for Ship Engine Repair 04 Apr 2002 Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2002	Kwok Ai Ing (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant as regards liability and costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
3	Star City v Tan Hong Woon: Enforceability of Foreign Wagering Contracts under Singapore Civil Law Act 24 Feb 2002 Tan Hong Woon (Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2002	Tan Hong Woon (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Star City was dismissed.
4	Star City v Tan: Gaming Contract & Illegality under Civil Law Act 20 May 2001 Tan Hong Woon (Defendant)Won	20 May 2001	Tan Hong Woon (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.