Tan Kheng Ann Alvin

Tan Kheng Ann Alvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and contract law. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legitimate Expectation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kheng Ann Alvin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Thomas & Leong	8 cases	100% of cases	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Interlocutory Injunction for Minority Oppression(Dec 2023) Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Minority Oppression & Information Access Dispute(Dec 2022) Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings: Contract Consideration & Variation Dispute(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kheng Ann Alvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	38%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	13%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Won	34.3 parties avg	4.3	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	34.4 parties avg	4.4
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kheng Ann Alvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,187,495.42	523,436.938 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Interlocutory Injunction for Minority Oppression 28 Dec 2023 Seng Lee Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Dec 2023	Seng Lee Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application against the defendant was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Minority Oppression & Information Access Dispute 08 Dec 2022 Seng Lee Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	08 Dec 2022	Seng Lee Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralWatching brief. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings: Contract Consideration & Variation Dispute 27 Oct 2020 SCP Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Oct 2020	SCP Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $38,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Teo Song Kheng v Teo Poh Hoon: Dispute over Jewellery Ownership and Possession 15 Mar 2020 Teo Song Kheng (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Mar 2020	Teo Song Kheng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for an account and delivery up of disputed items was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Costs, Offer to Settle 24 Nov 2016 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Nov 2016	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Profit Sharing Dispute & Oral Agreement Variation 20 Oct 2016 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2016	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for a 25% share of profits was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Living the Link v Tan Lay Tin: Unfair Preferences & Director's Duties in Insolvency 20 Apr 2016 Link Boutique Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	20 Apr 2016	Link Boutique Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment against the defendant. The court found that certain transactions constituted undue preferences. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Lee Siew Ngug v Lee Brothers: Rectification of Company Register & Minority Shareholder Rights 22 Apr 2015 Lee Brothers (Wee Kee) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	22 Apr 2015	Lee Brothers (Wee Kee) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Defendants' appeal was allowed and the Plaintiffs' originating summons was struck out. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.