Tan Kim Chiang

Tan Kim Chiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and abetment.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and intellectual property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Cheating by Personation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Illegal Immigration	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kim Chiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kim Chiang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Angela Wong & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011) UOB Venture Investments v. Tong Garden: Abetment of Cheating by Personation & Immigration Offences(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kim Chiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kim Chiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	1,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step 20 Feb 2011 Khek Tai Ting (Defendant)Lost	20 Feb 2011	Khek Tai Ting (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff for infringement of the same patent be dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UOB Venture Investments v. Tong Garden: Abetment of Cheating by Personation & Immigration Offences 19 Nov 2000 Tong Garden Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2000	Tong Garden Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of one month and a fine of $2,000. A sum of $2,000 was refunded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).