Tan Kok Quan SC

Tan Kok Quan SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and security for costs. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interim Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interim Certificate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kok Quan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kok Quan SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	Sakata v Naruse: Security for Costs Appeal After Change of Solicitors(May 2004) Mae Engineering v Dragages Singapore: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement(Apr 2002) Show Theatres Pte Ltd v Shaw Theatres: Avoidance of Transactions & Unfair Preference(Mar 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kok Quan SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	119.0 parties avg	19.0	33%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2004	119.0 parties avg	19.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kok Quan SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,461,515.60	730,757.802 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sakata v Naruse: Security for Costs Appeal After Change of Solicitors 13 May 2004 Suzanne Liau (Defendant)Neutral	13 May 2004	Suzanne Liau (Defendant): NeutralThe court varied the assistant registrar’s orders by apportioning $50,000 to cover the second defendant’s costs from the sum of $375,000 and by setting aside the order for the provision of a further sum of $300,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mae Engineering v Dragages Singapore: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement 24 Apr 2002 MAE Engineering Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	24 Apr 2002	MAE Engineering Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Summary judgment grantedSummary judgment granted in favour of Mae Engineering for $1,461,515.60 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Show Theatres Pte Ltd v Shaw Theatres: Avoidance of Transactions & Unfair Preference 27 Mar 2002 Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2002	Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe liquidator's claims against Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd were dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant.