Tan KY Won Terence

Tan KY Won Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Parties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan KY Won Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan KY Won Terence has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Genesis Law Corporation	3 cases	50% of cases	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2024) DFD v DFE: Joinder of Parties & Setting Aside Arbitral Award(Jul 2023) Neverland Investment Holdings Pte Ltd v P.T Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Default Judgment(Jan 2023)
Rodyk & Davidson LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation(Jul 2010) Mohamed Iskandar v Tan Seng Poh: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Apportionment of Liability(May 2008)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v DBS Bank: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan KY Won Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	67%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan KY Won Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	4(67%)	67%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	35,000.00	11,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 24 Oct 2024 New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2024	New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the Award was dismissed and Siddiqsons was ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to New Metallurgy (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	DFD v DFE: Joinder of Parties & Setting Aside Arbitral Award 19 Jul 2023 DFD (Claimant)Won	19 Jul 2023	DFD (Claimant): Application to add Trustee as party deniedThe court dismissed the Intervention Application and refused permission to the Trustee to participate in the present proceedings in any capacity.
3	Neverland Investment Holdings Pte Ltd v P.T Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Default Judgment 19 Jan 2023 Neverland Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Jan 2023	Neverland Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe amount of security ordered by the learned AR was reduced.
4	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation 20 Jul 2010 DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	20 Jul 2010	DBS Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal partially allowed and partially dismissedDBS's application for further discovery was partially successful. Yamazaki's appeal in respect of categories (a), (c) – (e), and (h) was dismissed, but its appeal for category (b) was allowed. DBS’ appeal for disclosure of categories (c), (f) and (g) was dismissed.
5	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v DBS Bank: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 21 Feb 2010 DBS Bank Ltd (Respondent)Partial	21 Feb 2010	DBS Bank Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for Respondent to the extent of 30% of its claimJudgment be given for the Respondent to the extent of 30 per cent of its claim against the Appellant, and that the Appellant be granted leave to defend the remaining 70 per cent of the same.
6	Mohamed Iskandar v Tan Seng Poh: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Apportionment of Liability 13 May 2008 Tan Seng Poh (Defendant)Partial	13 May 2008	Tan Seng Poh (Defendant): Partial LossThe Defendant was found to be 10% liable for the accident. No monetary amount was specified in the judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.