Tan Li-Chern Terence

Tan Li-Chern Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil litigation and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to cooperate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Li-Chern Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Li-Chern Terence has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Robertson Chambers LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Stay of Execution for Discovery Orders Pending Appeal(May 2023) Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off(Sep 2022) Kwek Pit Seng Jeffrey v Koek Ah Hong: Constructive Trust & Joint Tenancy Dispute(Jun 2021)
M/s Peter Low LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	AG v AHPETC: Interpretation of Town Councils Act & MND's Authority over Town Council Funds(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Li-Chern Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	33.7 parties avg	3.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Li-Chern Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Stay of Execution for Discovery Orders Pending Appeal 04 May 2023 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Defendant)Won	04 May 2023	Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Defendant): Application for stay of execution of discovery orders allowedDefendant's application for a stay of execution of the discovery orders in SUM 1169 was allowed.
2	Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off 29 Sep 2022 Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant)Won	29 Sep 2022	Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. Mah Sau Cheong was liable to Ng Koon Yee Mickey for the Tranche 3 Payment. Ng was entitled to judgment for the balance of his counterclaim after the set-off.
3	Kwek Pit Seng Jeffrey v Koek Ah Hong: Constructive Trust & Joint Tenancy Dispute 21 Jun 2021 Kwek Pit Seng Jeffrey (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2021	Kwek Pit Seng Jeffrey (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for a common intention constructive trust was dismissed.
4	Poh Chiak Ow v United Overseas Bank: Misrepresentation, Fraud, Negligence, and Vicarious Liability 29 Dec 2020 Poh Chiak Ow (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2020	Poh Chiak Ow (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2016 Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2016	Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe defendant was found guilty of importing a Class A controlled drug and sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment.
6	AG v AHPETC: Interpretation of Town Councils Act & MND's Authority over Town Council Funds 26 May 2015 THE ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Defendant)Won	26 May 2015	THE ALJUNIED-HOUGANG-PUNGGOL EAST TOWN COUNCIL (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant.