Tan Mao Lin

Tan Mao Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and stay of proceedings. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Originating processes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Data Protection Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mao Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Mao Lin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	9 cases	90% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Contract Dispute over Coal Briquetting Joint Venture - Damages Assessment(Feb 2022) Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave(Jul 2021) Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Abuse of Process, Director's Duties, & Henderson Doctrine(Jun 2021)
Jacque Law LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	Ang Hua Heng v Ang Hwa Khong Daniel: Trust over Property Dispute(Oct 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Mao Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	10%
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	10%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	20%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Won	54.4 parties avg	4.4	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	64.9 parties avg	4.9
2021	25.7 parties avg	5.7
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Mao Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(9%)	9%
Lost	1(9%)	9%
Neutral	1(9%)	9%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Stayed	1(9%)	9%
Won	5(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	10,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	6 1113	Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Stayed: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Hua Heng v Ang Hwa Khong Daniel: Trust over Property Dispute 12 Oct 2023 Ang Hwa Khong Daniel (Defendant)Lost	12 Oct 2023	Ang Hwa Khong Daniel (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found that the beneficial interest in the Property belongs to Mr Ang pursuant to an express trust. In the alternative, a resulting trust arose in favour of Mr Ang as he paid for the Property.
2	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Contract Dispute over Coal Briquetting Joint Venture - Damages Assessment 06 Feb 2022 Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Feb 2022	Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of Bayan International Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave 01 Jul 2021 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Respondent, Defendant)Won	01 Jul 2021	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedTung's applications to strike out Lin's appeals were allowed, and Lin was ordered to pay her $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Abuse of Process, Director's Duties, & Henderson Doctrine 01 Jun 2021 Pacific Globe Enterprises Ltd (formerly known as Wyser International Ltd) (Respondent, Defendant)Dismissed	01 Jun 2021	Pacific Globe Enterprises Ltd (formerly known as Wyser International Ltd) (Respondent, Defendant): Claim DismissedClaims dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Application for Leave to Appeal Decision on Reimbursement of Legal Fees 25 Oct 2020 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant)Won	25 Oct 2020	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant): Application grantedThe application to dismiss the plaintiff's application was granted. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Appeal Leave Application on Trial Costs Order 29 Sep 2020 Pacific Globe Enterprises Limited (Defendant)Neutral	29 Sep 2020	Pacific Globe Enterprises Limited (Defendant): Application opposedDefendants opposed the Plaintiffs' application for leave to appeal.
7	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Minority Shareholder Oppression and Taxation of Legal Fees 26 Jul 2020 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant, Intervener)Won	26 Jul 2020	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant, Intervener): Application for reimbursement of fees allowedSummons No 1281 of 2020 allowed; the plaintiff should procure the second defendant to reimburse the first defendant for the Fees that she had paid on behalf of the second defendant.
8	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Stay of Proceedings & Validity of EGMs 22 Jul 2020 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant)Stayed	22 Jul 2020	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Defendant): Counterclaim stayedThe first defendant’s counterclaim in OS 1446 is stayed pending the outcome of Suit 1048, on the condition that the validity of the impugned notices and resolutions is suspended for the duration of the stay.
9	Beyonics Asia Pacific v Goh Chan Peng: Abuse of Process & Director's Duties 27 May 2020 Pacific Globe Enterprises Limited (Defendant)Won	27 May 2020	Pacific Globe Enterprises Limited (Defendant): Action Struck OutAction struck out as an abuse of process.
10	Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause 03 Mar 2020 CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 Mar 2020	CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for stay of proceedings granted in partThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.