Tan May Lian Felicia

Tan May Lian Felicia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and injunctions. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rental Relief	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disobedience of order of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan May Lian Felicia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan May Lian Felicia has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	6 cases	100% of cases	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action(Jul 2024) Intertek Testing Services v Haidir bin Mohamad Khir: Discovery Dispute in Employment Contract Breach(Nov 2023) JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures(Feb 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan May Lian Felicia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan May Lian Felicia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	170,000.00	56,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action 09 Jul 2024 KPMG LLP (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	09 Jul 2024	KPMG LLP (Defendant, Applicant): Application to strike out parts of Statement of Claim dismissedKPMG LLP's application to strike out parts of the Statement of Claim was dismissed.
2	Intertek Testing Services v Haidir bin Mohamad Khir: Discovery Dispute in Employment Contract Breach 07 Nov 2023 Intertek Testing Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	07 Nov 2023	Intertek Testing Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal allowed in partRA 182 allowed in part.
3	JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures 15 Feb 2023 JTC Corporation (Appellant)Won	15 Feb 2023	JTC Corporation (Appellant): Appeal AllowedSummary judgment granted in favour of JTC for the full sum claimed in its prayer 1(b) of HC/SUM 762/2022 without reduction of the value of Hot Spring’s rental relief counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mittal v Westbridge Ventures: Arbitrability of Oppression Claims & Anti-Suit Injunction 05 Jan 2023 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Respondent)Won	05 Jan 2023	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings awarded costs of SGD 100,000.
5	WestBridge Ventures II v. Anupam Mittal: Contempt of Court for Anti-Suit Injunction Disobedience 30 Oct 2022 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2022	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDefendant found guilty of contempt of court and fined $70,000, conditional on purging contempt within one month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings v Anupam Mittal: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims 25 Oct 2021 Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff)Won	25 Oct 2021	Westbridge Ventures II Investment Holdings (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPermanent anti-suit injunction granted against the defendant.