Tan Mazie

Tan Mazie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Mazie has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in international commercial arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrotham Park damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Mazie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Mazie has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Setia Law LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	DBO v DBP: Appeal Dismissed in Loan Repayment Dispute Arising from COVID-19 Pandemic(Jun 2024) Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts(Nov 2023)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Phua Seng Hua v Peter Kwee Seng Chio: Appeal on Tort of Deceit, Negligence, and Breach of Contract Regarding Clubhouse Redevelopment(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Mazie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.4
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	27.7 parties avg	7.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Mazie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	400,000.00	200,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DBO v DBP: Appeal Dismissed in Loan Repayment Dispute Arising from COVID-19 Pandemic 23 Jun 2024 DBV (Respondent)Won	23 Jun 2024	DBV (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants to pay the Respondents’ costs of this appeal, assessed at S$100,000 to be paid within 14 days (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts 29 Nov 2023 Nikolaos Alexandros Platias (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2023	Nikolaos Alexandros Platias (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
3	Phua Seng Hua v Peter Kwee Seng Chio: Appeal on Tort of Deceit, Negligence, and Breach of Contract Regarding Clubhouse Redevelopment 10 Mar 2022 Exklusiv Resorts Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	10 Mar 2022	Exklusiv Resorts Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.