Tan Ming Yew Clarence

Tan Ming Yew Clarence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and insolvency law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ming Yew Clarence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ming Yew Clarence has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fervent Chambers LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	All Measure Technology (S) Pte Ltd v RHB Bank Berhad: Moratorium Application under IRDA(May 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ming Yew Clarence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	19.0 parties avg	9.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ming Yew Clarence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	All Measure Technology (S) Pte Ltd v RHB Bank Berhad: Moratorium Application under IRDA 16 May 2023 All Measure Technology (S) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	16 May 2023	All Measure Technology (S) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for a moratorium was dismissed due to non-compliance with procedural and substantive requirements.