Tan Pei May

Tan Pei May is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Pei May has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and business litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Pei May has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Pei May's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Pei May's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Choo Lye Weng (Defendant)Won	22 Dec 2022	Choo Lye Weng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant.