Tan Pei Qian Rachel

Tan Pei Qian Rachel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and performance bond. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marine Industry Sponsorship Scheme	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Pei Qian Rachel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Pei Qian Rachel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute(Jan 2017) Goldrich Venture Pte Ltd v Halcyon Offshore Pte Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Marine Industry Sponsorship Scheme(Apr 2015) TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment Disputes(Oct 2014)
CLASIS LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Pei Qian Rachel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	25%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Pei Qian Rachel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Withdrawn	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	6,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Dec 2022	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant.
2	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute 08 Jan 2017 Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Jan 2017	Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the Plaintiff's application, effectively ruling in favor of the Defendant.
3	Goldrich Venture Pte Ltd v Halcyon Offshore Pte Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Marine Industry Sponsorship Scheme 20 Apr 2015 Halcyon Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Withdrawn	20 Apr 2015	Halcyon Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim WithdrawnDefendant's counterclaim for damages arising from the loss of its status as a sponsoring shipyard was withdrawn.
4	TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment Disputes 09 Oct 2014 TYC Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Oct 2014	TYC Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Prayers dismissed in partPrayers dismissed in its entirety, save for Consent Order No 1 and Consent Order No 2. Costs of $20,000 awarded to TYC (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).