Tan Po Nin Jeslyn

Tan Po Nin Jeslyn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and family law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Po Nin Jeslyn has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Braddell Brothers LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	VIG v VIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce(Oct 2020) VIK v VIL: Estate Administration, Property Sale, and Beneficiary Rights(Aug 2020) Traxiar Drilling Partners II Pte Ltd v Dvergsten: Breach of Directors' Duties & Fraudulent Trading(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Po Nin Jeslyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Po Nin Jeslyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,049,162.54	11,049,162.541 cases	1
USD	7,579,960.00	7,579,960.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VIG v VIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce 12 Oct 2020 VIH (Defendant)Partial	12 Oct 2020	VIH (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsWife entitled to 30% of the matrimonial assets.
2	VIK v VIL: Estate Administration, Property Sale, and Beneficiary Rights 18 Aug 2020 VIP (Defendant)Neutral	18 Aug 2020	VIP (Defendant): Aligned with PlaintiffAligned with the Administrator’s position that Property 2 should be sold.
3	Traxiar Drilling Partners II Pte Ltd v Dvergsten: Breach of Directors' Duties & Fraudulent Trading 22 Jan 2018 Dvergsten, Dag Oivind (Defendant)Lost	22 Jan 2018	Dvergsten, Dag Oivind (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$7,579,960 for breaches of director's duties.