Tan Poh Ling Wendy

Tan Poh Ling Wendy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and winding up. Their track record shows a 31.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stocks and shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage of Personal Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-recourse Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation of Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Recourse Loan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rule B Attachment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Poh Ling Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Poh Ling Wendy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	13 cases	81% of cases	Gunvor SA v Atlantis Commodities Trading: Winding Up Application Dispute(Jul 2024) Da Hui Shipping v An Rong Shipping: Contribution, Subrogation & Ship Mortgages(Jun 2024) Urip Cahyadi v. Henry Surya: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute(Apr 2022)
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	13% of cases	Rudhra Minerals v MRI Trading: Coal Contract Dispute over Agreement Formation(Sep 2013) ATS Specialized Inc. v LAP Projects: Dispute over Tripartite Set-Off Agreement for Trucking Services(Aug 2012)
KhattarWong	1 cases	6% of cases	Regalindo Resources v Seatrek Trans: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Poh Ling Wendy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 5 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	6%
Lost	72.8 parties avg	2.8	44%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	53.7 parties avg	3.7	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	35.5 parties avg	5.5
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Poh Ling Wendy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	7(44%)	44%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	5(31%)	31%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	564,506.46	94,084.416 cases	6
USD	325,781.40	325,781.401 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Gunvor SA v Atlantis Commodities Trading: Winding Up Application Dispute 23 Jul 2024 Atlantis Commodities Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Jul 2024	Atlantis Commodities Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up application dismissedWinding up application dismissed; costs of $20,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded against the claimant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Da Hui Shipping v An Rong Shipping: Contribution, Subrogation & Ship Mortgages 27 Jun 2024 Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Non-party)Neutral	27 Jun 2024	Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Non-party): NeutralContested OA 418.
3	Urip Cahyadi v. Henry Surya: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute 28 Apr 2022 Urip Cahyadi (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Apr 2022	Urip Cahyadi (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of an oral agreement was dismissed.
4	BZW v BZV: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice in Shipbuilding Dispute 11 Jan 2022 BZV (Respondent)Won	11 Jan 2022	BZV (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed, upholding the setting aside of the award.
5	PetroChina v Ocean Winner: Admiralty in Rem, Moratoriums & Companies Act 14 Jan 2021 Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jan 2021	Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff): Summonses dismissedThe court dismissed the summonses filed by the judicial managers of Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd.
6	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders 08 Oct 2020 Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Oct 2020	Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs and disbursements in the total sum of $40,000 to be paid by the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Taylor v Sinfeng Marine: Leave to Appeal Disclosure Orders Under Companies Act 17 Oct 2019 Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Oct 2019	Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders for disclosure granted against the defendantOrders for disclosure granted against the defendant. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
8	China Merchants Bank v Sinfeng Marine: Pre-Action Discovery & Validity of Bunkers Contract 03 Oct 2019 Sinfeng Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	03 Oct 2019	Sinfeng Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed.
9	Poh Lian Construction v Lauw Wisanggeni: Directors' Duties & Construction Project Management 02 May 2019 Chan Kin (Third Party)Dismissed	02 May 2019	Chan Kin (Third Party): Claim DismissedThe third party claim was dismissed.
10	Qilin World Capital Ltd v CPIT Investments Ltd: Breach of Contract & Mortgage of Personal Property Dispute 05 Mar 2018 CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2018	CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant): Appeal DismissedCPIT's appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim was dismissed.
11	CPIT Investments v Qilin World Capital: Costs, Offers to Settle, SICC 04 Mar 2018 CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff)Partial	04 Mar 2018	CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff): Entitled to recover costs and disbursementsThe Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs and disbursements in the amount of S$460,506.46, plus HK$648,427.57 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	CPIT Investments v Qilin World Capital: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 27 Jul 2017 CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jul 2017	CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff): Application for stay of execution dismissedQilin's application for a stay of execution was dismissed, and CPIT was awarded costs of SGD 4,000 plus disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	CPIT Investments v Qilin World Capital: Injunction Variation & Fortification of Undertaking 14 Sep 2016 CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff)Neutral	14 Sep 2016	CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedThe Plaintiff's applications were dismissed.
14	Rudhra Minerals v MRI Trading: Coal Contract Dispute over Agreement Formation 24 Sep 2013 Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Sep 2013	Rudhra Minerals Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed due to the lack of a binding contract.
15	ATS Specialized Inc. v LAP Projects: Dispute over Tripartite Set-Off Agreement for Trucking Services 16 Aug 2012 LAP Projects (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Aug 2012	LAP Projects (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for the full sum of US$325,781.40, as the amount owing under the March 2011 Contract, with interest payable at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ of Summons to date of payment. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the costs of the action.
16	Regalindo Resources v Seatrek Trans: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 15 May 2008 Regalindo Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 May 2008	Regalindo Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application to restrain the New York Proceedings was dismissed.