Tan Qian Ni Roseanne

Tan Qian Ni Roseanne is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in professional conduct and division of matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in medical malpractice and professional conduct.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dentistry and dental practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Qian Ni Roseanne has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Braddell Brothers LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision(Jul 2024) Singapore Medical Council v Chua Shunjie: Medical Professional Misconduct & Disciplinary Proceedings(Nov 2020) VIG v VIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Qian Ni Roseanne's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Qian Ni Roseanne's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,049,162.54	3,683,054.183 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Amit Patel v Singapore Dental Council: Appeal on Professional Misconduct in Dentist Supervision 23 Jul 2024 Singapore Dental Council (Respondent)Partial	23 Jul 2024	Singapore Dental Council (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against orders partially upheldAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against orders partially upheld, with the period of suspension reduced from 15 to 12 months, and the imposition of the penalty of $30,000 set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Singapore Medical Council v Chua Shunjie: Medical Professional Misconduct & Disciplinary Proceedings 03 Nov 2020 Singapore Medical Council (Appellant)Won	03 Nov 2020	Singapore Medical Council (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Singapore Medical Council's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to be struck off the Register of Provisionally Registered Medical Practitioners. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	VIG v VIH: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce 12 Oct 2020 VIH (Defendant)Partial	12 Oct 2020	VIH (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsWife entitled to 30% of the matrimonial assets.