Tan Ruyan Kristy

Tan Ruyan Kristy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and contempt of court. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ruyan Kristy has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	67% of cases	The Inquiry Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal - Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(Sep 2023) Attorney-General v Xu Yuan Chen: Contempt of Court, Publishing Scandalous Material(Apr 2023) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(May 2022)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice(Jun 2017) Seagate Technology International v Vikas Goel: Enforcement of Guarantee and Indemnity(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ruyan Kristy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	52.0 parties avg	2.0	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ruyan Kristy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19,000.00	6,333.333 cases	3
USD	14,148,856.32	14,148,856.321 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Inquiry Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal - Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 05 Sep 2023 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	05 Sep 2023	Attorney-General (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court found in favor of the Attorney-General, upholding the Correction Directions.
2	Attorney-General v Xu Yuan Chen: Contempt of Court, Publishing Scandalous Material 05 Apr 2023 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	05 Apr 2023	Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantJudgment for the Attorney-General; costs of OS 694 fixed at $4,000 and costs of SUM 3816 fixed at $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 09 May 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	09 May 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs AwardedThe Attorney-General was awarded costs of $7,000 and reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed between the parties, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Election During COVID-19 Pandemic 29 Jun 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Attorney-General was dismissed.
5	Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice 26 Jun 2017 ANG PENG TIAM (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2017	ANG PENG TIAM (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed.
6	Seagate Technology International v Vikas Goel: Enforcement of Guarantee and Indemnity 28 Jan 2016 Seagate Technology International (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jan 2016	Seagate Technology International (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of US$14,148,856.32, plus interest and costs.