Tan Ruyan Kristy SC

Tan Ruyan Kristy SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act (pofma) and freedom of speech. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act (pofma).

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	3 cases	21% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Ruyan Kristy SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Constitutional Right to Equality and Prosecutorial Discretion(Aug 2022) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction(Jul 2022) The Online Citizen v Attorney-General: POFMA, Freedom of Speech & Constitutional Law(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Ruyan Kristy SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Ruyan Kristy SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	21,000.00	10,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xu Yuan Chen v Attorney-General: Constitutional Right to Equality and Prosecutorial Discretion 24 Aug 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 Aug 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Xu Yuan Chen to pay the Attorney-General the costs of the appeal fixed at $15,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction 24 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $6,000 awarded to the Attorney-General, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	The Online Citizen v Attorney-General: POFMA, Freedom of Speech & Constitutional Law 07 Oct 2021 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	07 Oct 2021	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal.