Tan Sheng An Jonathan

Tan Sheng An Jonathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and torts. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sheng An Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Sheng An Jonathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira v Hashstacs: Misrepresentation, Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy, Cryptocurrency(Dec 2024)
Tan Lee & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	G1 Construction v Astoria Development: Summary Judgment & Illegal Moneylending(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Sheng An Jonathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%
Won	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Sheng An Jonathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,088,951.43	1,044,475.722 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira v Hashstacs: Misrepresentation, Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy, Cryptocurrency 15 Dec 2024 Munchetty Investments Ltd (Claimant)Lost	15 Dec 2024	Munchetty Investments Ltd (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	G1 Construction v Astoria Development: Summary Judgment & Illegal Moneylending 09 Oct 2018 Mface Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Oct 2018	Mface Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal in Registrar's Appeal No 80 of 2018 dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.