Tan Sher Meen

Tan Sher Meen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and judicial management. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rights Management Information	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parallel Imports	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Sher Meen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Sher Meen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	67% of cases	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers(Sep 2021) Golden Hill Capital v Yihua Lifestyle: Appeal on Judicial Management & Asset Sale(Aug 2021)
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe	1 cases	33% of cases	FUJIFILM v PTC Business Systems: Trade Mark, Copyright, Passing Off(Nov 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Sher Meen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	35.1 parties avg	5.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Sher Meen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Unknown	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	50,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FUJIFILM v PTC Business Systems: Trade Mark, Copyright, Passing Off 29 Nov 2021 FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff)Won	29 Nov 2021	FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInjunction, delivery up and forfeiture or destruction; and the order for an inquiry as to damages, or at the plaintiffs’ election in the alternative, an account of profits, or statutory damages in lieu of damages, in respect of the infringement of the copyright in the 3rd plaintiff’s computer software/firmware in the relevant Fuji Xerox Equipment and the infringement of the 3rd plaintiff’s rights in the rights management information in such computer software/firmware. Additional damages in the sum of $100,000. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers 07 Sep 2021 Ideal Homes International Limited (Appellant)Lost	07 Sep 2021	Ideal Homes International Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Golden Hill Capital v Yihua Lifestyle: Appeal on Judicial Management & Asset Sale 29 Aug 2021 Ideal Homes International Limited (Respondent)	29 Aug 2021	Ideal Homes International Limited (Respondent): -