Tan Shou Min

Tan Shou Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and electronic discovery. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Shou Min has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Electronic Discovery	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Notes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Shou Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Shou Min has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: E-Discovery, Keyword Searches, and Post-Search Review(Aug 2012) Silverlink Holdings Ltd v Rockline Ltd: Dispute over Settlement Agreement and Right to Appeal(Jan 2011)
Drew & Napier LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes(Apr 2010)
Unknown	1 cases	20% of cases	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: Electronic Discovery Protocol & Search Terms Dispute(Feb 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Shou Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Partial	25.7 parties avg	5.7	40%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	24.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Shou Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200.00	100.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 21	Neutral: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: E-Discovery, Keyword Searches, and Post-Search Review 15 Aug 2012 Vikrant Kanyal (Defendant)Neutral	15 Aug 2012	Vikrant Kanyal (Defendant): NeutralConfirmed that he did not have in his possession, custody or power any discoverable documents.
2	Breezeway Overseas v UBS AG: Electronic Discovery Protocol & Search Terms Dispute 27 Feb 2012 UBS AG (Defendant)Neutral	27 Feb 2012	UBS AG (Defendant): Order for electronic discovery protocolOrder for electronic discovery protocol in stages with the use of search terms.
3	Silverlink Holdings Ltd v Rockline Ltd: Dispute over Settlement Agreement and Right to Appeal 12 Jan 2011 Superon (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2011	Superon (Respondent): Application DismissedSilverlink's application was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Superon (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Superon (Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $100 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes 25 Apr 2010 Superon International Limited (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2010	Superon International Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court will hear parties as to the appropriate remedies and relief before making any order herein. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.